NONNI v 0 i (IM@ 0 rtvl 1%; -ST At, Date of AL@vant' of .tioa Tf-t tbeirizo 2 A 1.@. ip le t@., 41 CA$ PurPo"t To stuay tbe-iA!4@Uve-v&Xua of "9,988mnt concepts derived from the Wecb*]Ar up-= bospitaltzed patients vith var)dag pattems Df smtoms OWZTRK130) leltiateds xoyeubat@-196o 7 Gr Contractor gr8nt4 Of coott W,570-(O Statuai Actually,, a "ries of@@-attidlet-vhich have been-very- productive to date,, (When Filled In) No. Cost Account Object Class Obligations Obligations Unli7quidated Date Reniarks and References Incurred Liquidated Balance 22 1960 DEC AL (Wlien illcd In) bt Ito (When Filled In) CONFIDENTIAL FUNDS POSTING VOUCHER VOUCHER No. 2 7- 12 7- 12 DATE 2- 6 VOUCHER No, 58-67 60-70 71-00 DESCRIPTION-AL2L OTHER ACCOUNTS 13-33 34 3T 43 47- 52 53 ALLOT, OR COST DUC 5 T A I ON 40.42 F OBLIG 5A-57 ACCT@ NO. DATE AMO(JNT 2 28,3@; Cooe EXPEN u Ay REC, Nb. GENERAL ...... TIA N;. E 67 Jr DESCRIPTION- 2 CODE N p ;Cr. CA LEDGER 6 2 0 J".Cl ADVANCE ACCOUNTS 13.27 P.O. NO. rptor, NO. 0 LIO. Accl. No. eR @ACCT. NO . .;@ ' CLAS5 a Or 2 C P C D I 7 13, F CODE :=,.IrotojccT No, s L-i EXPLANATION OF ENTRY 2 TOTALS DATE PARED BY @DATE REVIEWCD BY CERTIORIED FOR PAYMENT OR CREDI-R- 2 siGNATURE DA A- 4 (10-Ag) ,FORM 0 ." 606 IE 1-i" .... EDITIONS. 29 November 1960 XDOMMAN-MI CXM@,-p-YDU= DlfT-SlCN YU I Tw/*Aget Micer-- IUYoitt-Nollo-AUotwnt W5.1009@1902-- 2 I- IntoLO-00,. 1-LC&tt#Abed7tdt@ti@-the s:@subprojecto Paym;t a-head-be mM4 at foumi Caablers amouat of $13.-570@. Oa -fozmArda4 to-Chlef TSDN"ax@ch B;tMeb@ 20 Tb*-t@@ shota4 be It throtigh TOD/@W@t Offi,;er, no luter tbm Toef,@UY, -13 V@-.;ember 19600- 36 Thiv-it--"it7&21-invoice. that additioml-funds- vil3. b"UgetA@@s l@oject the riles ObOU14 not be clostd. ter Ctnl,-@y T"T @@ ;, @. A@@ Att*4": Oria & 2 AddLmssee 1- TSDI/-PA- (Wh.. I Wd 1.) CHER NO, (FinAnce use only) SUBM By 2 vou A " 13D BY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTING PERIOD OF FOR ADVANCE 2 ACCOUNTING TO 'FROM 12 Doombw 31 ftooobw 2.992 2 10-tfu-tions on R!Vef@20 DISBURSEMENTS RECEIPTS 2 DESCRIPTION AMO 3 DATE 1. CASH ON HAND BEGINNING OF PERIOD Z. DATE DESCRIPTION Nil E two 2 TOTAL EXPENSES ta. c ------ 2 -F4. RIELFUNDED "EREWI*M I S. CASH ON IOAND ENO OF PERIOD ACCOUNTED FOR 2 ACCOUNT FOR T AL TO-TAL TO that the expenditures listed hereon And FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE 2 OVED r fy I CERTIFY ognv A tachoonto were incurred for official pur. 'URE F APPROVI2NG OICFICElk i-- Of . OBLiGATIOPt REFVENCE NO. CHA$TGE, ALLOTMENT NO. ,4T4: SIGMAY P. PR of a co fidential p&ture. that P4YPeOt at 2 ef:odi@ that not been received,.ond th 10 fo 11 ":"true and cofroct- 2 thi Ccounl,.A "3 12254390-3W- mg S I GNOkTURg Of AUTHOR I Z ING OFF lCcf4 CERTI 2 iED FOR IP.Aym@ENT 02 CREDIT li;4ATURE OF P DATE S5iGNATURE CERrloe ING OFFICER VA @E 2 SPACE BELOW FO EXCLUSIVE USE OF FINANCE__P_IV_L@ N VOUCHER 0. 7-12 REVI,EWEID V PREPARED by 2 56.67 7i.80 3A-39 43 47.S2 Op COST, DUE ALL OTHER ACCOUNTS 40.42 45-44 ALLOT. AMOUNT STATION EXPENC F ACCY. NO. DATE 2 '7 PAY a OL -Z .0@ PER 2 .1 I @)i. IF 11 ........... ... CODE c DESCRIPTION ADVANCE ACCOUNTS 13-27 P - 0 -NO', poop ' L-0: YRA CT t4o ositcv 2 Ar CLASS ODE x otw. 2 C . . . ...... 77 7- 8 T ALS FO Rm MINRY STAT CPENDITURES JAWMY I DECMER-31, -1962 Balance January 1, 1962 667 57 January, 1962 $5-383-25 April, 1962 S:383'@2 July, 1962 2 5,383- October, 1962 S,3 December, 1962 @ft&02 0 $22,696.57---- Ex nditlures Salaries 6.60__ 3 9.84 0.00 2 66.46 80.38 550.00 140 46 100:00 -78 388.04 fl6,0019 1,013 080 Equipment 2 617.20 Telephone and TolegraPh 445.53 other Supplies and Materials Travel and Field Expense 433.36 paymelits to outai.do individuals 182.00 stationery and Office Supplies 127.12 Pilme and Camera Supplies 120.474 112.95 50.00 Posta(je 7 Book$ and - 39,99 Indire-et Cost 24873.00 -- 22.017.47 679 10 2 Com:ftitments Dacmber 31,-1962@@ :45 Balwice De.--ember 31, 1962 @67 Us_ co t@ Lef c 7 I certify that -,@4r,,,-"als have@-beert satisfactorii.-,,, .-@xpenditurps were incurre-.1 on c.- i Date: RIM" iA.trillEy i,-1961-fO L'Et&.-iBER-31, Jartijary, 1961 t3i392-50 April,, 1961 3s392i25O julyj 1961 3t392-50 October 32392 50 1961 ----- 913o570-00 I neiitur 2 S3sOOO 222 3 .00 8.27 64 Social Se ity 2 $93@27.25 Teloph4ne and Telegraph 518.46 fluilding and Gretind Charges 235,00 166.4,1 St*-tio Su-p-p2lies 133-44 Payment to rklt Individuol 125.00 freight a-nd 750-00 Travel and F Expense 51.@o Indirect Coa@t 2 I.L?70.00 12,902.IL3 667.57 Colmit)rents ro-ceml-or 31., 1961 2 83,20 Polance reco,%ber 31# 1961 S 5.@4-37 Certified Corre6t TSS/Chc.mical Di-7is-L3,n 9 Date-#' Receipt,,As hereby- acknowled4ged of -the fol-loving. I)tcember 1960- ditW--- t of 29 limaber 1960 )00$DRKMM FOR--C=s FLU= Drfmcm Yu I =Itudeot *Moer projo" xw=A#-&byroltct IV a25-1009-1902 2 LOW4CNoo I It att&cbod covering tba- abo" Peowt 6bmld be w" toum I O"Utrts --tb4 ar4kmt, of 5W.00 Ibis Is a final tayaoeo Bvwwve"LPA@e it Is anti-f--t 1 tb&t sbm" twt,,)* TWR$search Bran& Attacbe4t@@--- Dtatrftuuont Orig & 2 - AUMmm I - TSD/FASS - INYOICE rw 4l3j570,00 ............ (1) 1-t-is berev c*ruftod that--tbis-- to Znyoioe-Nol- 1-6voiA" to2 that "ritees on bei4*comp@UsW in aecordan" vith mutal agm- mats,, that & dOt4&lled agenu of tbi-@@o &A recelp+.4 to on in-loloo that tbis2-'biu to just amd owmt e4A tbat- pay- Date i (2) 1+, L# Yo. mA that tba- project Is beitia --carried out In aeowdwioe vith the mewrwam of- 13 April 1953 DGI WIAG WA- 3tb-. exwmion of tbit- autb*rit-y in frm the Be agrw Director Date t 0-3 IV 0 Cli, so 6 46 CFO DRAFT 10 Nol3w@ V. 19 -AN MORAlfi -, FOR: THE RECORD SUBJD,T HMTRA,, Subproject 130 1. This- 2subprojE@dt:@@is,. fdt@7!the Vurpose-of financingp4@ --- --- tt-ached p oposal on Personality Theory in Patients vith Different-SMtotW;"----- The worf. will be-trorfonned- 2. The attached--prpppqAlLgoRt"4@@@te detail-the-tech.- nical scope of the projt,.cto I"@(7@@the large program for st,iiiy of the-Wechsler-BelleVV@@tinterpretive-syoem-devel d, for@@ the indirect-assessment-program@@7 llilWNNJLTRkNo;7177) will-be a major -contrioutor--to the develqp@@@@- ment of *,his study.- 3. The total-cost-of-tbit7prOject-for-a-period-of one year i s e s-titi-Ated not to exceed $13.,570. 00 - - Charges - should b,,-, made against Allotment-1125@@1009.190L>, 4. This project-vil.1-be for see,-irity- and cover purposes. Accounting for funds t)cy@d-shall@'@6iid@to-the established pro- cedui@es of that organization.---------------, 5.' Title to any pp-i-i@an8ent-eqVipmp-nt purchased by fund@-@@d--- re n in eu 0 er overhead rates* t,3o-lb In comection with travel under this P.IOJect., it is agreed at the Agency-will accept tbe_-travel documentation and accounting th which conform with-thp. fractices-of 7 Uas en leared throiwh TOP SECRET witting of -true-sponsorships e Attached- Research PtW DISTRIAMOLI: 0'riginal onls@@ APPROVED FOR -OBLIG6kTIOTi OF FUNW,. DL8,Ate Applic4stion for Ro3earoh Grant to -------------- ----------------------- - Persomlit :Th -PaVitM"th Difft -Symotoms@2@ in ir.iolpal InvepttgA C, In3titu tiort, Financial Officer*. Principal TAV*Stlpt_or Oct. 24 1960 7 Lulhorlzed Official rsonality Theory --wyw7wri-- s'wi t Symptoms eni 1. Q@@ive@s of the Work tt2pos-ed The pvrpose of the propoRod--studio3 is to test certain aspects person2ality theory by comparing-tho subtest performance on the tal.'Ligence Scales of p"nt grou s differing primarily in overt symptoms$- Two such studies-are-anticipated. -The first till be an investigation of -the Wechsler scores-of a hyp o--conver3 _@es and will include-com--- parlsons of comparable subgroups-oberactotited by different-symptoms. second will consist-of -a--comparison of the subtest porformance-of comparable groups of migraiie and ulcer pationts,@ It is proposed that the three major dimensions-and their inttrroldti6nshipst-(as formulated by- nd as described belba be aMlYtbd within and-acros3-lba-groupse oif-researe lity theory offkff two--major advantages,, 1. Some aspeots of the theory are immediat2elg@@ -objectively verif tablt. 2. From a long-range-point-of@@low, the method by which the-theory--- orders the data permits of-relatiVelv-s@R@@ prodiotions-concern- ing the individual't bthavior-,, I2n order to clarify-sdt"f tb*7MJor-tAh orstioal--7d6hsiderations-to-be in- ve3tigated, a 'brief-suc=ry-of t Aamemiguincluded.here@it-The-suwary@is based on direct-infdtmation-f and on Sa-inder-'s-researoh-mom-ii----- oranda, (see bibliography)i@@g -Wog..4,iven more-explicit-ot4temont in a sopera to memorandum-b"auriders:-::(I-) Accordi,ngto-the-tbooryi7:tho-personalit"ttU@6tVMand-function-of individual c-an-be-oxprossed2 in-toms of ttf*oibasto personality dimon-- sions. These-dia*nsions-oonstat-of the Etternalizar@Int@6@lizer-,-tho-- Ploxible-Rigid,-and-the Aoceptable-Unacceptable continu4s,--Tb-oso--will@@- her2eafter be referred to as the E-I-F-B--and A U dimensions- respec- tively. As the individual-dtvtlops,-he is confrontod-with-the task of-rocon-- oiling his ba3ic-personality pattera with@@164"nviro=ontal-7@@ 2 social demands I which-require-him-to modify-hi@@@ition on each of- the three basto-continua. His-modifications represent tbe-extent to which the individual is abl6 - to -efto4@0-sto f or- the 1 imita t ions on adjustment imposed-bi-his-basio@Vorsoriality2@7struoturo. The theory furth#r-postulates tl@.at-th4-@individual In modif icatioris of his basic personality pattern, as well as the tW§i* dimensions them-, selves, are refloottd by his-perf6rmance-7oA@@V@i6@Us subtests of the ------ -- Wechs2ler his score on the Diii"i@@h subtost shows his position vith regai-,t to the-E-I-dimension, his ultimate looation on this continuum being d4tarmined-by modifying factors which-are-in- dicated by his Arithmet'Aa and Informa on scores, His DI-0-ok Deti2pn- score dater-min63 his placemont-on tbo-FwR-oontinuum-, modified by-his performance on the Simi,lariti*s and Comprehension subtests. His position on the A-U dodtlmuun Is shown by his score on the Picture Arratgement subte3t, !nodifiod by his Picture 2Completion and Object Assembly Performance. s dtvsloped a method-of expressing-the dynamic-structure of inual, in terms of throe formulae wh4kch are based on Wechsler subte3t performance, bar, represent the- development of the individual's p7orsorolity structure across time, 2 M*thod Since the studies will test different-hypothesog; certain procedures for collecting and treating the data will--be different for the two inv63tiga- tion.!3. Procedures which-will be specific to each study are described-first. Those which will be comm@on-taF@both2 studies are discussed later, under-the-------- section'davoted to the treatment of the data. A. The Conversion-H.Ysteric Study- Conversion hysterAo,@Lor-o-Ahouht to constitute an excellent group for an investigatioa. -- rsona ity theory, in-that their particular 3ymptvwu pros ssential aspects of tb6 individual'UdYtWOid struottirt. Ji pilot study, based on 46 06nversion-subjeot6,- -AIM&AAz-h"n com-pl -at -ad and has orovided results-vhich are consistent w oratical fo2mrile.ti,)ns.. Though-the number of subjects W4@s _partio- ularl.y in the comparisons based-ork-sub,3r-oups, the significant findiagt% and a numbor-of trends which we're-found, are thought to be wall worth-&-more extensive aralysi"ith-a-larger@@samplai-- The pilot study is summarized-in the-Appendix of_this proposal@@-lVs r-esul 3 t the tOI16*i6eh@Nt a,ugges h es:-- Is Pronounced-son3ory-and motor-sympto&63 will be more-charooteristio 2 of predominantlYl=@@@. 2. Severe an"requentl@ generalized head-ohes--will-oocur more a in prodominanilt-@71'3ubjo-ots. (This does n6t include-migr§lnesi which theor-@tic2ally-constituts a different type of symptL@i)@7--- 3. P"dominantli@--l'l' fewer 5nd less 3pe0i io symptoms than will th4--@o@@ly "El'-ttoups.- 4. Both--tbe F-R-and-tho-A--2U c-ontin-ua-will be related-to-symptom-choice.- 5. Predominantly -IIII--and 1"7tdofe-i- on the Piolure-OftO at on subtest-of-the-Woobsler-Scales-*illAi or in their OlDressed-symotoms. In accor no$ with theoretical ex-2 pectations of:Aheii@@respe-o-tive tendon-ciea--toward withdrawal and identif loation. 6. Behavioral differences apart from-svmotoms vill@6 raoter ze-t a prodominentlT-!S@t-and the@7ked66i4"tly7illIll grouos, these differ- on,:es dopending-to some-oxtont-on the locatic@n of the-individu8l on the F'-WR-and-A-U oontinus._____ Sample The samplo will consist of ap roximatelT.@@jeots.- whose modioal--.@2- records do not lndicate-reurologi6AY7t@ktholo@@ andwbo have been diagnosed as conversion hysterios-by examining no-urologistsg--It is anticipated that the-age range w- III ndtigo-b4los 15 or above 49 years,-- and itat ment2ally retarded-su-bjecta wil be excluded. Saoifi-o Procedures 14 The o"urcence of the vario rmulas will- be -datemined first for the group as a who 2. Wsohslor subtest performianca-of comparable subgroups-characterized by different 1symptoms will be compared, 3. SP40ifi* hypotheses pertaining to the relationships between symptom aboics,'persor.ality structura,-and behavior.-as defined by the. th*ory, will be tested. -3- 4. The influence-on Woobsl6t subt6st performarico of population variables suoh-as-age-@sel, aducatioml-and sooio-sconomio back- ground, and intalligtnes (,as-measured by the individual's normal 2 level, in aocordance witw the theory) will be analyzed# B. The Cometrisons of mi ti"tS-. Ulcer and migmine-pationts have-b46n sale eir,use permits the to-sting of a nuiDbar7of hypotheses wbi-- ory implies. Those hypotheses are as-follows: 1. Theoretically, the predominantly "I"-individual 1--' so 0 ideationally-dbminent@@and:tend3 to,*ard-witbdrawa -3 prodioted-t@At such 3ubje2cts:Oill to more obaraot uloor, groups.-------- - 2. In contrast, the prodooinantly "Ell-individual-l(@bk"Vit"tdl- is parcep 'wv-AtvAl-nA-t--An onvit6nmentelr"nsitivet dio2ted t a migraine patients-will consist of--- subject -in the -IIE"_category. 3, It is furtl,.er--en-tioipe,@@@@Stb of the oomponent-of.At,,e@--individual@@@@@y, as-datormined-Lby the three formulae, 4111 be a al.gniticantlf-differentiating 4. With respect to -tbe-F-R-cdntinuu-ra@- it-is--V"dioted Ati&"lder--- patients will- be-@:oad6cDiMntIY7"F"7i@6dividuals. sated" subjects in 2 partioular-should tend toward ulcers, because of the continual-@hysi6logit4l-7*M7oy6hological@@"fii-@itb@:*bioh-- their equilibrium is maintained.--The-o-r-e-Aidally'@low Block Design soores plus lbw-Similatities-r"fotMnts shoul2d bt-bi6t4-t of m"lariti6s score-indicates-a- - tondoaoy toward repression. On the-other hand-a-high Simil6ritios----- score in a-low-Block Design record-ointi-to greater control of emotio2nalit"nd repression# which- would represent a-oontra-indication of-the formation of ulcers. 5. It is hyppi@@ that- th" lents will consist- chief ly-of :-@661,nantly jeots. onsa tory - factors, 2 oorre3ponding-to-th6t"t" -ab6V47iK-66hhdction with prodomi--- nately-"F" gr6upd-@@ill be stvdi6d -for the predominantly "R" subjects.---- 9. it is furthei@@hypoth"it*d tlAt--tb-6@ttrongtb of com.oonent3 of the individual's-per3onality structure, as re- presented by the three formula*, will-b"-aignifioantly differ- It is a@.,ao antioipatod-that-th6--4xjislity of the individ)jalls social relati6"hips2 will-be--tolatod-td@hit7psychologiool-401-- libri@%n'- and possibly to bi&-sympto-m-cboloo-a3--WO11-0 Therefore,-- his ef-vtlopment along the-A-U oonti!..-,uum will also-be-studied.- sam22le Approximately 50 uloor and 50 migraine patients are anticipated. In- sofar as possible, the groups will-bo-limitod to those without evidencz of further medical complications.--The diagnoses will be medically de- tomined. Groups comparable with respect to ago, sex, educational and ocio2-oconomic levels,-and-intelligence (as measured by noroal-lovels)- :111 be use,@4. It is anticipated that subjects will be restricted to those between the ages of 15 and 49, and will not include the mentally retarded. 4 §_poc@f ic. Prooodures- It The occurrence of the veriou riqu a will be-studied within eaoh-of--tho-tf*"C- 2. The ooeurrence-of-the va ou mulas in the groups 2 will be compared@-@ 3, Specifio-by"eses related to the symptoms of ulcers and migraines in terms of the-tbeory will be tested. Treatment of the Data The expe rimental dats will 66nalst-of-the-thre formulae--computed for each-- subje2ct, and besed-on weighted-tobte$-from-the-goohaler-subt-ests. I'vrtbero soores will be derived from-&--tbeory-do-termine&-ii-ightin of various degrees of comperi,3ation--of the in4ividuallt--t@&gi6--tandMies, to produce-thr 9 n a2 scores for each-subject on eaob continuum.--TK6-@illb"nt-arp ted as re- presenting the strength of-tho basic dimahsions,within-the individual's per- sorality configuration. The data will be tx-eated-in acoordanc2e-with-theoraticaY7P@Wi@67tionsn---Con- tingenoy and Fish6tils-exact testb). will be applied, to determine the-diffetthtial7ltcid6-@f the various per3onality76Wigura- tions within and betw2een the grou as In aralyzing the-resultr@ fdi@:Ah-e--str4-ngth of -twbaste- tendencies , -tests-of-- the differanoes-in-loc-ation-of tho7@core istributions groups will be-perf6ft6d y means o the- t distribution, or its non-2 parametrio arAlogUe,--depanding on the Mt7ure of-the data-obtained- a Influence of pertinent populiaion variables on test iDerformehO7*il--l- probably be analyzed by eppropriate anal-v@@i"-Vd-eiance-Aachniques 2 Although the studies-vill- theory,,--(for which one- tailed tests of significance a-re sometlm6s lus6d), only,-tvo-tailed-Assis- will be employedi in order -to-ptmit the interp"iotion theoretical results. 3. P6riod of A one-ytar p-rojoot to 4, Estimted g d"lt-- P3yobometriat and Research Assistant-so-....*..* ... 6,000 Co-Principal lnviesti.ptor (part ...... 3,000 Clerical 4$23iStance-tport 1 t 800@@ U I 3 0 a I la ne ous . . . a . . a 4 . a - 0 . 0 . t a . . 0 'k 0 0 - * . 0 . 4 0 6 6 - a - 0 - 0 . I , . 0 . 0 . 1-IL.00-0 - -- -- (Psychologic,al Test2 Equi@@@Off ice Suppl4*@@Telophons Tawl) Total of Died-WC6sts. t . . a o , . o 11,800 4-Vre-o-t-C-,ost Allowence.- In ... 6 -570 Total Cost.* ......... ...... ...... qqalifications ef Inysiliaiors 6, Previous Work in this Area A pilot study, based-on 46 conversion hysterics, hasb*on completed. It Is described in the Appendix which follo4s. 7, Other Sources of'@@ Support has not been nor-i3-being reqU83ted-4of other foundations. --O-- 6 Ap,oandix ilot study- in -Persona ty Theory $ion Hysterics--- Sample The sample ALA @"MAA eyami uated at 2 The subje -Y and their rooord3 looked indications of neurological potb.ologyi -Thf7tt@@@anged in age from 15 to 49, with a mean ranged ftW6-to-140-- mean 10.44. nar4 were 14 malb@i-and-32 fi@m-a es& re tested on the Wechsler Bellevue Intelliganoo-Sealo, F6e6-lls IJethod The experimental data con-sisted O"ho-thr 146--datermilied foi.--- OaCh 3ubjeot on the-baste-of his 2 weighted- oohtlbr-subAestt.--- dat-3 were studied both fo-r tbe-group-as-"bole, and-inl-comparitonslof -subgroupo=.@ within it. Since diffefrbtit-orotedVt6§ and different rssulta--ve-&--obtain6d they are s-eo4 r pro s 9 nt o dbe-low 1. The Pilot Stuy with-the-Whol6 A. Procedurts In the attempt@to study symptom-choide@--the-following groupings-were - Used for the various ty#@@ manifesteo:______ 2 1. ' ftinting-spells,--dizziness, drowsiness @-ard goneroliad -ttatO-"f-- weakness, stakihg-a-nd nausea. 2. Pain In areas-otbt@e-ttWti--'tbe head region.--- 4@ Paralysis of extremities,-and spasms---Jerks-and numbhoss in- theti- areas, 5. Pronounood sensory-symptoms, 6. Niitrbness-and jerking movements in the head and face region. B. Treatwent of the Data and Results 1. Pronounced sensory symptocns 2 --(#5)-,cora--found In 7 of the 46 subjects and were-significantly more obarao-teristio of pe*dominantly E in- dividuals (a--.dotermined by the fir3t-formula). Age and normal I One-tailed tests of significance-were used when direction was prodioted-i7n advance, Othor#ise . tvo-tailed -tests were used. -- Reported "trends" within the .10 to .20 levels. 2 -*02 by Fisher's exact test. 7 I#v*13 did not significantly Influence the occurrones Of these symp- toms, nor were any significant 4diffe7tanoes--obtain$4 between the compensated and uncomponsatedfge"ts:"owever,' a t2rend in the - direction of inoressod-ntzbers of subjeoti--iii-the compensated groups, (10 and EC) was ob$orvodo- 2. In studying the formqlaa or suojeots witb pi,onjunood-sonsory symptoms,__ it was not6d-that the 32 oiie-2 in the group who suffered from hysterics: blindr,033--WOrCL77VV4§Opensated-oompensated Individuals in their loca- tion on the-F-R continuum. This ougge--s-to-d--a---fu'rthat@@y-of such subjects, of whom there-were 9.----Th-es-e-9 were almost oqxjalli--divided between"llll@ "E" subjects according to their first formulae 7 Vo- ooming "El individuals ai@@ @-to tb#j-,teoond.--All-6f them con- ad 's "I', individuals -third - f ora olud a- - in- the- ila departing signif icantly from-tba-bypothosis_of-an-equa--I--E-I---Split,% The abova-wntioned rosults-are thought to be in line-vit --i thoo for -ti6h& -the follow -n--g--re-- c- Dist retics muls w I spa u sensory areas would-be-d6f6--tyktqa@l o@f-"2S" subject.6,--who are theoretically perooptuall dominant@:end ibo,_tf:@@"t@@@ld tend-toward defensive- ness in this-respect,- Further, in conneation v lacoment of Ahe -individ2ual on the F-R continuumi-::@it-would t subjects-in wb6m the 'IR" com. ponent V$3 COM rativel i -ri-nt-ir .0., a ppea the- th ird-- fomula 2 and be tbarefor#--- only) would remain affected by tbeir-"F" characteristics, subject to coniusioral@states. 3. Numbness and jerking movements in the head-and fa@"Agions-(#6)'wers---- 2 significantly more-pr6valaht Among the "3"-tubjects.0--l@"irki- -Omotrin these individuals. movements were-espeotally be latter war", primrily motor distu -rbances, 2 all'of the s@UbJeots who suffered from Motor disturt4@6es wore selt@@ted out, and a mar@-.,t trend in the-dirootion of increased numbers in the '!&"-indiv-1 -jals was observed.--- These findings I-2 too, are thought to--be--consistent with-the,,theory, -in That motor disturbances would be exp@Oed in "B"--groups-vh6@@both- perceptually dominant and environmentally-"ni-itiiioi-7- - 4, I'ain2tirig and-generalized states-of weakness, sbaking@--and nausea which oco@rr,ed in 15-of-th@--46 subjects, vere-significantly::@@heraoteristio of the-dull@group. than of th6-brighter subjects.6 A 2 found in the 3 For 8rAIY30s based on age, the group was split@At -the median-(37,-69), creating a young and old group_eaoh_vith 23 subjects.- Nonsignificant differences in-- their mean norml levol3-and sax-distribuii6ns t#" -obtained2, In studying Wluont,,* of normal-levol---@@brijtht group of 31 subjects with normal-lov@ols-of 10 and over, an4 a dull group of 15-individuals with normal levels below 10 wore used. No significant differences were found between-their mean a4ges-and their sex distributions. 4 R< .004 by the binomial test. 5 'g,< .015 by Fisher's exact test. 6 R<. .008 by Fisher's exact testi 8 direction of more-subjects in thi jnoompensated versus the compensated groups, with the greatest number of individials falling in the unoomponsated E category, Age *Ss a non- significant factor.- Thes2e results are-supportivo-o-f t-lio--tbeory, In %bat a less---- differentiated level of perceptual disturbance, reflected in sensory symptoms- would be anticipated in predominantly "E" subjects who are I 2 oharaoterited-by a Idw6ti@i4oi of intellectual functioning, 5. The f ollowiblt@tt6nd@ were also- noted a he group iiitd--fdbf-4b4drants aooording-to oupings, subjects were-distributed as followsak- Uncompensated I ---Uncompensated E- 0022n---t-d I---- Compensated c _$a 0 - -9 It can be seen that th2ere-is-a-trend toward the greatest numbers of subjects -f4slliWiii-th67twd766@ipensated-groupa.-- While--more subjects-are needed for a-m6re definitive-breakdown in-tortbs-of quadrant-placements, the redominance ofco2mpensated subjects is consistent witb@tht6t6AitAl e-xpeot-stioris.- b,- Aħtrend -to-.iard-f airer symptoms, _usually t6mewhat to@6@@d td@@bb--ddre ol-Aracteristic of @the In their natura,-was found "F4-@subj6@4@@ing a greater number of relativelt7tp*O@@@la-int -s. Whil6-]lth4@:t*4:@domponsated groups showed2-no-:-marked differ,@rioe@it@@these-respeots, all--- of-the 10 uncomp@@@17§bbj*dW complained-of- symptoms, wbile-only, 4 of the 8 unGompensated-"E"-In- -did -of 3-ol@27mors- dividuals -so, the remainder oomplaini4g@ l@teither-age nor normal ltvol-influenced those results to any marked extent.-- as 2 well as tbeir-relatively greater specificity, may again-reflect- tbeir-pareoptual do-mtiAt@@-4t@@iated epee-ifioity;7"-- compared to tho-ideationally@@ @@@moro-abstraot--"I" group, 6. 2 No significant-7f6"lts-or marked-trends were-obtained-@with-re-- Ssrd to the remaining symptom groupings,- However-a-more theory-oriented-olassification of these symptoms is-thought to b4@-Worth attempting, 11. The Pilot Study-with Sub2grou s.- (N a-14)9 A, Procedures A subgroup was so acted out-of tho-who 4 sample, consisting of a sub- jeot3 with low scores on the Picture Completioh subtest of the Wechsler Scale. A low PC score was-dofined as-@3-or more-in-ralation 2 to the-in- dividual's normal level. -Fourteen of the 46 subjects met this criterion. This subgroup-was-chosen because-of-the-theoratical distinction made In the meaning of a low-PC score-in a-predominantly "I" and a predominantly-- "E" individual. The1oretically. such a score in the fomer suggests with- drawal in the dirlootion of autism. On the other hand, in the latter, it Indicates withdrawal ebiefly through identification ' It was therefore thought that this distinotion-might-be--reflected-in symptom choice. 8, Treatment of the Data-and Results Seven of the 14 "low PC" subjects were found to be in the "I" category and 7 iii-ithe "El' group,-as-datermined by the first fomula. Six in each group were compensated i and I was un- compensated. The groups wore eldtoly matched in terms o2f sgx-dis- tribution, chronological age, and normal level as moll-as on verbol,,Rerformance, and full-seals IQ, and range and mean PC 3cores, The following resultt7*t@t@@-ot-tained:--- 1. None-of-the 7 "S"-subject6--Ufferod from.-boadachas and all-of-the 7-11111 subjects-sufferoo from-severo headaches-. (Note: None of-tbass were migra-ine-s, the-latter-being-------- - -in the-convers on group* atsent This is-2in line with-- theoretical expectations, since migraines-cons-titu a different sym tom-in-terms of--tbe-individual.@-s dynamic structure).- it-is thought that those results 6t6 6trongIY704"4@ttive-of 2 ......@RIWJWt@eoratical views, in that headaches would be aot to ocour-irL--th-e- @Mti-o-n-a-llY-@@dominent. I-individuals, F(i@hor-- in most-cases the "I"--44bjtd@ts- reported headaches of@@e or- -- -- less-goneraliz-ad notaire- suggkoting the ebarooteristio--Iaok76f---------- s-poeif ioity in-su individuals. 2. Of the headache suff6ii6tt, 3-e6-Wttd no-additional-gymptomt. ThiO-@1%7@'tru"-Individuals--according-tct-the third formula, and wore-also-Ioi@&6t6"-tho--three--fomulao&LLlt6ffO@@ibing- "I" subjects included-2 "irullindividuals--lil't2f%"-6nd 1 "ifu " ThVt@@"f them 66holuded as I'@nace-a table"-on the i-U contitWum,y-,whilo 6 were originally7l' able." It may well be-that-th"ffort-s at adjustment-mado-by-tbass 2 subjects was-flirtber complicated by their unaccepta@ilityt which would tbooraticallt-fd-fleot inc-ro,,3sod-diffi"ltios in-tho individual's-soc ial@"I,ationsbiMthus lnereasin&Ahe-need for------- compen2sation.- - I"it"f-t o apparent distinotion.in connection with headachosi-7;tbe-romaindor of-tbe conversion-subjeots (not-- cheracterizod-by low PC scoras) was surveyed fort7th@;3@ oocurrence-of 2this symptom. Nine-such subjects were found, 4 in the group-and-5-ih--tb@o 'OEli.a clearly nonsignificant 7 Each group included 6 females-and 1 msle@-7 go for-the I-W6vV*&s from 17 to 44 years,- meen-33-@-66-Vwbilo-that of the 9 group was 20 to 49, mean 2 36.16. No significant dif@forencos were found between the age ranges. Norml levels for the I subjects ranged from 8-to 12i moan 10.14, and for the 7 group from 9 to 13, mean 10.83,-With nonsignificant differerices obtained between them Nonsignificant differences were-also obtained-between their full-scale,-verbal,-- 1 and performan(,e IQs. In both-,- PC soores-voro7@@@to -7. means -5 600 &--@;4163-(NS) $ 2 fC.001 by Fisher's exact test. p k < .016 by tbo binomial test. 10 difference, This finding tends to support the rationale for conducting further ,study of "low PC" individuals aith additional subjects, rather than lt?ii considering the division In terms t j components alone -,,f -'I' -and .4. In tho-IIE" group,-a-trond toward-symptoms centering primarily in the area of-the legs-and-feet-was noted. This was observed in 6 of the 7 "&"--2,subjects, as opposed--to 2 of the 7 "I" in- dividuals* Thet@@@"Iso a predominance of walking-diffi- oulties-4mong th6 191 subjects. - Since 6 of the 7 in the "E" category were componsated,-it-may be that their motor difficult2iet-@fbfleot the later development of-a-n "I" compor@ent@=mitigating-against a primarily environmentally dominatod-orientation.- 5. On the A-U continuum, in contrast to "&'I subjects-began-as--"acceptable" according -to 2 formula 10-shifted to the "unaeceptablell,aocording-to tbe-::@ second,il-and werB'about equ3lly divided in-tbis-rospoot on the third.---- - These findings suggest-ttAA-@Lthe-A-U continuum-may-be-ralevant-to symptom@choiee-,-perhaps opMting-differenti!ally-with Usically77 different typo3 of porsonalitt@oonfit4otionsi 6. On the F-R-66htthUUt6@@b.-ith-groups were approximately divided-botween 'IF" and "RII-btbli@t@§@Aecording-to-Ahe-fit%t- and-second-fom-ulas, H(@Wever,--accoraing to the third,--6 of--- the-?-"I" stbJocts concluded as "R" individuals-@@vhile the, "El group-rou,,ained about:@"ly-divided bet"en@'Ift" and -"F.- This trend toward increased rigidity on the part-of'Illsijbj6@dts------ with low FG--$oo"sL*ould-@@2@dorable theoretical Importance, if substantiated-by-furtbar "Investigation, -- lt7tlso@constitutes a further indication -thatthe ti-ea t-4sto continua-and- their -inter@ relationships must all be into consideration in e2valuating- personality functioning @po@ vi-6,*--whioh the-Ah4a-ory-stresses. 7. When the subgroups-were combinod-into a single-"low PC"-group,---- 14). a cignificantly greater number of ''compensated" a32 opposed-to "uncompensated"-subjeoAs--wera frund (,when compared 'L '* --of to the possibility oria@@ual division) The'rglevance this-finding to the theory boo already t-een-commentod oh under results obtainod-foi@Lth"ole--samploi:@ 8. Significant be@avioral differences apart from symptoms were also obtained-in-oomparing the-two "low PC" groups. Among the "I" subjec is I,- 5 -of - the -77*6f"14Mcterized by periods of abrupt disruption of control with outbreaks of irrational emotional display-;74bil6@--hd@-bf-the "El' subjects demonstrated- this behavior.13 Tht@se results, which were based on the psyotolcigical and psychiatric-- records of the subiects. strongly suggest that further-investigation--- with a largor-samplo-might serve to support the theory in terms of differential emotit.-.al reactions It would be anticipated that the interrel0ations among the contin@; would be highly pertinent in ibis connection. .2c_- .016 by the binomial test. .016 by the binomial test. p < .01 by the binomial test. .025 by Fisher's exact t6st6 @uoTSry _at the Pilot llpdz b r of trends, in accord Some statistically signifioant-results as Wal' as a num a with theoretical gxpectations woro found in a pilot study based on 46 oon- version .5ubjes,-to.-l-V"lg =dings were related to the three-major personality dimeo3iqM. eory, i.e., the I-E, F-R, and A-U continue). Sig- nificant'al lor, as well as in symptom-cho-loo, 'tore al;so-notod. The conversion grouo appears to be well -suite-d-to-a--more extensiva-inve3tigktAqw. of2 the theory, since symptom-c',',%oice-presumably reflects basic aspects of the in- dividual's dynamic struoture. Tho-prolimiiia@v767ik has suggeated a number-of hypotheses which warrant furtbor-t6sting vith a larger sample. 2. Saun-Jors, s 6m -the WAIS battery-for-two2-groups of norma mles.- - -PsZchol@@ 1060@@S. 629-541. 3. Saunders, D. R. A Paoto"nalysis of-the Picture C04plotion-items of--tho---l WAIS- -T. 21 hol.. 1960,-161- 146-149.; 4. Saunders, D. R. A Computer 2program to fitid the bost--fitting orthogonal factors for 6-giva"ypotb"is. klyobometri 1960, 25, 199-205. 5. Saunders, D. R. Further implicatiotW-of-Mundy-Castl@'s correlati@"-betwee-n BEG and Wtch-%ler-B41lev2ut::@@riables. ETS R"*-- 6. Saunders, D. R, TW06htribution of communalit"timatiorL-t@@--t-be achieve- mont of - fa@dtorial lnvariance , with special rqf orenco to -Abe ETS R 9. Bullij 60;65.-1960. 7. Saunders, D. R. Digit-Spa2n and-alptA-ft@-64,dontV- a-oross-volidation, - ETS----- Res. Bull.. 60-3,-11960. 8. Saunders, D. R. Evidence bearinix-o_n the-ex_istenca_of a rational oorrespon- donee botieon the porsonality'typologies of Spmnger-and-;iiAg. 0 R-os.-Igll.,_@0-6@ 19607@ -5c) 8 Novemb,-.r 1960 K",NORAN-DUM FOR: THE -RECORD bUBJErT Research Meetin ATTFNDANCE 1. TI-@e L Sal on Personality Th2 tiente-vith Different V?,Ir con- sidered at a meeting-attended by-the- was avay on a training mission.-- 2. Tne proposal@was a-pprove